The Rule Of Jenny Pen
New Zealand’s The Rule of Jenny Pen doesn’t just crawl under your skin — it burrows deep into the rotting core of society’s neglect for the elderly, all while delivering a masterclass in psychological terror. Directed with suffocating tension, this horror-thriller pits Geoffrey Rush’s stroke survivor former judge against John Lithgow’s grotesquely charismatic psychopath, whose puppet-assisted reign of terror exposes the grim reality of aged care neglect.
Rush vs. Lithgow: A Masterclass in Horror
If there’s one reason to watch The Rule of Jenny Pen, it’s the phenomenal performances from its two leads. Geoffrey Rush plays Stefan Mortensen, a once-powerful judge now rendered helpless by a stroke. John Lithgow, on the other hand, is at his most deranged as Dave Crealy, a sinister nursing home resident who uses a child’s puppet to torment his vulnerable fellow residents.
Lithgow’s portrayal of Dave is the kind of unhinged, spine-chilling madness that will stay with you long after the credits roll. He’s gleefully sadistic, hiding his own malevolence behind the eerie, grinning puppet that serves as his weapon of choice. Rush, meanwhile, delivers a deep performance, his every flicker of expression capturing Stefan’s frustration and fear as he fights back despite his physical limitations. Together, they create a nail-biting psychological war — one that’s as thrilling as it is deeply unsettling.
The film’s greatest strength lies in these two titans clashing in a decaying rest home, their performances elevating what could have been a standard horror into something far more unsettling. Lithgow’s Dave is a monster hiding in plain sight, exploiting the system’s indifference, while Rush’s Stefan becomes the audience’s desperate avatar of resistance.
A Harrowing Indictment of Elder Care Neglect
Beyond the scares, The Rule of Jenny Pen is a brutal critique of how society discards its elderly. The retirement home is a microcosm of institutional failure — understaffed, underfunded, and rife with unchecked abuse.
Through its themes of dementia, disorientation, and powerlessness, the film forces viewers to confront uncomfortable truths about how the elderly are treated. It’s not just Dave’s abuse that is horrifying — it’s the indifference of the system that allows it to continue. In that way, The Rule of Jenny Pen is more than just a horror film; it’s a social commentary wrapped in a nightmare.
A Flawed but Ferocious Final Act
Despite its gripping tension and sharp social critique, The Rule of Jenny Pen stumbles in its final act. After a brilliantly tense buildup, the climax doesn’t quite deliver the gut-punch the film seems to be setting up. Instead, it feels rushed and slightly underwhelming — almost as if the filmmakers didn’t know how to end such a dark and powerful story.
While it doesn’t ruin the experience, it does leave The Rule of Jenny Pen feeling just shy of greatness. Still, The Rule of Jenny Pen lingers like a nightmare — partly for its scares, but mostly for its unflinching gaze at a societal rot we’d rather ignore. Lithgow and Rush ensure it’s a film you won’t shake easily, even if the ending doesn’t stick the landing.
Support Pario Magazine
$2.50 / month
Early Access